Owens does his thing and does it well. But the graphics seem to be less delicated before and apart from the theme, it is starting to be same ol' story over and over again. New version is great again though
I didn't like their site at all especially version 22. Some of the other ones are good, for example the one in the screen shot. Their site is inconsistent, one version will be really good and the next will be something a highschool kid could make with frontpage.
ehh, where do i begin with volume one??? for this site to be in the top 25 is ludacris. this site's 15 minutes of fame was up back in 1997. how anyone can still tolerate this guys redesigns are well beyond me. it is recycled over and over again. and his main menu option is season?! so we go to the recycled site just to look at his site recycled every quarter of the year. Volume One shows us no promise for advancements. I wonder if Matt even upgrades his design software b/c i see no reason why he should. i read that someone said "It really has used the potential of Flash technology". the kind of crap he does in his site can be taught in mere hours to someone who has never even heard of flash before. Flash's potential is much much greater than Volume Ones. Volume One is the epitome of design block. Maybe if this site had some intention, maybe a better menu w/o all the annoying pop ups it has, and changed its layout from time to time...this site would be given a little more respect. Until then...this site gets the gas face. 2 stars out of 10.
I'm personally amazed this site has been rated so well. While volumeone obviously has a skilled hand at Flash and graphic design, the usability is atrocious. And I don't have the patience to wade through the entire site trying to figure out what the site's purpose is (if anything). No thanks.
This site could have been better, the other sites have cool intros, the graphics were massive, and the scrollbars were very, very annoying - scrolling to find empty space. I would recommend making the images a bit smaller.
gives kickass first impression, but when you take a closer look, it lacks depth and visual excellence. certainly not bad, actually quite likeable and good, but not best in its class.