Rating Breakdown for Pixel : Industries - Designs


	Home Top 25 Wow Lists Latest Reviews Login Search Suggest Print E-mail List Review Rate

Average rating: 6.6 (32 votes - 7 anonymous) for design Pixel : Industries

JoshuaD (3)


Presentation		9
Graphics		10
Usability		5
Technical		9
Personal Slant		9
Overall		8.4

No review

Yaz (4)
Apr 9th, 2003


Presentation		3
Graphics		10
Usability		3
Technical		3
Personal Slant		3
Overall		4.4

agreeing with the rest here..

very nice graphic design but usability needs a real boost!

karl (6)


Presentation		7
Graphics		9
Usability		5
Technical		7
Personal Slant		7
Overall		7.0

No review

bukumala 2 (17)


Presentation		7
Graphics		10
Usability		5
Technical		6
Personal Slant		8
Overall		7.2

No review

Amarelito (44)


Presentation		10
Graphics		10
Usability		5
Technical		10
Personal Slant		9
Overall		8.8

No review

didulica (44)
Dec 5th, 2002


Presentation		8
Graphics		9
Usability		3
Technical		5
Personal Slant		7
Overall		6.4

"Nice design, extremely poor navigation and usability"

that says it all.

i360 (4)
Nov 28th, 2002


Presentation		6
Graphics		8
Usability		2
Technical		6
Personal Slant		4
Overall		5.2

Nice design, extremely poor navigation and usability.

But then again, if their ultimate goal was to show-off certain design skills, they've succeeded. However, I wouldn't let them develop my e-commerce site though.

ZiBBi (2)


Presentation		7
Graphics		9
Usability		5
Technical		6
Personal Slant		7
Overall		6.8

No review

addisondewitt (9)


Presentation		7
Graphics		8
Usability		1
Technical		8
Personal Slant		2
Overall		5.2

No review

marc_nichols (57)
Jun 25th, 2002


Presentation		6
Graphics		9
Usability		2
Technical		5
Personal Slant		7
Overall		5.8

How from time to time briliant illustrations are let down by an abysmal navigation and communicative strength of the site.

A design made by artists.

mirko (7)


Presentation		8
Graphics		6
Usability		7
Technical		8
Personal Slant		6
Overall		7.0

No review

DeeJay (36)
May 15th, 2001


Presentation		7
Graphics		8
Usability		4
Technical		7
Personal Slant		7
Overall		6.6

it's nice to see a distinctive design in these times of uniform webdesign. the site is well-executed and boasts an array of lovely details.

Joda (2)


Presentation		7
Graphics		8
Usability		5
Technical		7
Personal Slant		8
Overall		7.0

No review

Hanson (28)
May 6th, 2002


Presentation		4
Graphics		9
Usability		4
Technical		6
Personal Slant		8
Overall		6.2

Less is more, and it has never been so clear as in this website.
Shame, because graphically it is tighter than the chewing gum under your shoe.

ugwump (31)
Apr 16th, 2002


Presentation		8
Graphics		10
Usability		2
Technical		7
Personal Slant		3
Overall		6.0

This is all that's wrong with usability on the web (exception: see volumeone).

I don't deny the designer's fantastic skill in graphic design and flash. And it definitely has that edgy futuristic look and feel.

But patience runs real thin trying to navigate the site. Everything's much too busy as well.

Howard Wooten (2)
Mar 15th, 2002


Presentation		1
Graphics		8
Usability		1
Technical		5
Personal Slant		5
Overall		4.0

Mark Klein the designer / developer of Pixel Industries is quite competent. He is the creator of multiple websites ( not only this one ) with a very strong grasp of precision HTML / DHTML and design detail. His weakness as illustrated by Pixel Industries is his understanding of information display and usability. This web site although admittedly beautiful presents numerous navigational and usability challenges. For the sake of excessive graphical embellishments Mark ignores the key underling user issues that must be addressed at the core of any web site. Again, I respect Mark as a designer ( and have for years ) but I feel it's time he raise's the bar a few notches and start to work out these glaring short comings.

JB (28)


Presentation		8
Graphics		10
Usability		2
Technical		7
Personal Slant		8
Overall		7.0

No review

nat/x (4)


Presentation		5
Graphics		7
Usability		2
Technical		5
Personal Slant		2
Overall		4.2

No review

fish (6)
Feb 27th, 2002


Presentation		6
Graphics		8
Usability		1
Technical		1
Personal Slant		1
Overall		3.4

This is a web site design company?! I found more ways -away- from their site, than into it on the front. Not to mention the incredibly tiny type.

Once I got in, I found more mystery meat navigation. The ALT tabs did not prove useful, WWW3 and WWW4? How about you say what they are, if I did not have a graphical interface, I'd be lost.

Entering into the Corporate Web site, I had to maximize my window to see all that was going on, and then the convention for linking was changed! Just when I was expecting to click on circles, they switched how they linked to things. Not to mention all the useless moving things that distracted me from finding actual links.

As a site design company, you would think they would have put more effort in a simple to use, backward compatible, efficient, and usable site. The goal is to attract clients, not to hopelessly confuse them with obscure links and unreadable text.

samktheman (27)
Feb 19th, 2002


Presentation		8
Graphics		9
Usability		8
Technical		3
Personal Slant		6
Overall		6.8

Ok...so the graphics are good, but they take a long time to load. The scrolling="no
" that was put in some how was annoying, as I stick to 800x600 and I couldn't see the bottom.

Pearl (31)
Jan 3rd, 2002


Presentation		6
Graphics		9
Usability		5
Technical		6
Personal Slant		7
Overall		6.6

Rather novel and interesting contrast between theme (machine) and the soft, delicate graphic translation.

wallie (6)


Presentation		6
Graphics		6
Usability		5
Technical		5
Personal Slant		6
Overall		5.6

No review

newstoday slave (15)
Nov 18th, 2001


Presentation		7
Graphics		8
Usability		4
Technical		5
Personal Slant		5
Overall		5.8

sometimes it is not a bad idea to keep usability in mind, you know.

mere (5)


Presentation		6
Graphics		9
Usability		5
Technical		6
Personal Slant		7
Overall		6.6

No review

Cat* (5)


Presentation		8
Graphics		9
Usability		5
Technical		7
Personal Slant		7
Overall		7.2

No review